[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FW: BOUNCE mibs@ops.ietf.org: Non-member submission from ["Shawn A. Routhier" <shawn.routhier@windriver.com>]
- To: mibs@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: FW: BOUNCE mibs@ops.ietf.org: Non-member submission from ["Shawn A. Routhier" <shawn.routhier@windriver.com>]
- From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:21:52 +0100
From sar@epilogue.com Tue Mar 26 15:17:19 2002
From: "Shawn A. Routhier" <shawn.routhier@windriver.com>
To: mibs@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Reverse lookup tables
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <20020326231717Z7850-195+8033@stovokor.epilogue.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:17:07 -0500
In the SCTP MIB that I've been reviewing they include
a series of tables that they plan to use for looking up
an entry in the main table via a different key. To me
this seems like an ugly solution, however I don't see
a better way to do it or any violation of the specifications.
Does anybody have any comments on this style of lookup table?
regards,
sar