[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Typos in the MIB boilerplate
- To: mibs@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: RE: Typos in the MIB boilerplate
- From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:13:02 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15583DB0D@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> Mike, I have the spelling error fixed in my copy.
> Unfortunately I cannot right now update the online webpage,
> and it may in fact take several days before I can, sorry.
Yes, I notice that it is inaccessible.
> The comma is a questionable thing. It is not in the other
> (normative) references either, and als[o], RFC-Editor has
> and been using that style to put a comma before the "and".
> So I won't make that "fix".
I just checked RFC 3418 (as an example) and you are right.
I thought I saw it in the other (normative) references in
the boilerplate but I guess I was mistaken; sorry about
that. I'll need to fix the references in my own document
to match the current style :)
Thanks,
Mike