RE: SIZE constraint language for InetAddress index objects indraft-ietf-ops-rfc3291bis-00.txt

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
>          When this textual convention is used as the syntax of an
>          index object, there may be issues with the limit of 128
>          sub-identifiers specified in SMIv2, STD 58. In this case,
>          the object definition MUST include a 'SIZE' clause to
>          limit the number of potential instance sub-identifiers
>          or else the applicable constraints MUST be stated in the
>          appropriate conceptual row DESCRIPTION clauses or in the
>          surrounding documentation if there is no single DESCRIPTION
>          clause that is appropriate."

I like that -- it's much better than my original suggestion.  Please
remind me to put something along those lines into Section 4.6.5 of
the review guidelines doc when we open it up for revisions.

//cmh