[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: The SNMP Information Model



hi

Yes, I ran out of time before I could look at applications.

The RMON part scared me a bit since the more interested bits really involve
defining operations on existing objects, which, as I'm just learning UML, I
wasn't quite sure how to model. 

If there is sufficient interest, I can tackle these in an update.

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: Natale, Robert C (Bob) [mailto:bnatale@lucent.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 11:17 AM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
Cc: MIBs (E-mail)
Subject: RE: The SNMP Information Model


Hi Sharon,

Interesting start.  I think you need
to add consideration of a broader range
of MIB domains -- esp. from the applications
and RMON domains, say -- to have a more
generally applicable view of "The SNMP
Information Model".

Cheers,

BobN

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sharon Chisholm [mailto:schishol@nortelnetworks.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 8:31 AM
> To: MIBs (E-mail)
> Subject: The SNMP Information Model
> 
> 
> hi
> 
> I thought this might be of interest to this list ...
> 
> I haven't seen the announce for this yet, but it is up on the website
> 	
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chisholm-snmp-infomo
> de-00.txt
> or, for prettier pictures,
> 	
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chisholm-snmp-infomo
> del-00.pdf
> 	
> It's a bit rough, but I'd be interested hearing what people think.
> 
> Sharon Chisholm
> Portfolio Integration
> Nortel Networks
> Ottawa, Canada
>