[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt

To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: Re: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
From: Michael Kirkham <mikek@muonics.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 07:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "mibs (E-mail)" <mibs@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155028EC3F0@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>

Two things:

1. "TEXTUAL CONVENTION" should be "TEXTUAL-CONVENTION".

2. Probably a pointless nit, but why use Integer32 rather than Unsigned32
for types that have explicitly non-negative ranges?

--
Michael Kirkham
www.muonics.com

References:
- Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
Previous by thread: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: Please review and comment: draft-ietf-ops-vlanid-tc-mib-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread