RE: What needs to happen wrt. MIP transition..

["Soliman, Hesham" <H.Soliman@flarion.com>]

 > The larsson-v6ops-mip-scenarios builds in part on an earlier version
 > of the tsirtsis-dsmip-problem draft, and also on the same notes as
 > the williams draft builds on.  I'm going through the latest version
 > of the tsirtsis draft now - it would be nice to hear from George and
 > Hesham if they feel we've managed to capture the necessary parts of
 > the tsirtsis draft in the larsson draft, and if not, what would be
 > needed to make it more complete.

=> I'll read it and let you know in IETF or on the list. 

 > 
 > [snip solution stuff]
 > 
 > > 
 > > I think what we need is:
 > > 
 > >  1) people reading those scenarios/problem statement 
 > documents, and 
 > > commenting on them, after that,
 > 
 > Agreed,
 > 
 > >  2) consolidating the different inputs into a single document, then
 > 
 > Agreed,

=> Agree too with both above.

 > 
 > >  3) figuring out which existing WG to process it and the 
 > follow-up work 
 > > (or whether to spin off as a BOF)
 > 
 > Yes, this will be the next crux :-)

=> I was hoping to avoid having to go through another
WG setup process to get this work done. It would be good
if we can use existing ones (we all know there is no shortage
of WGs here ;) MIP4, mip6, v6ops....)

 > 
 > > Depending on if we manage to get to 2), but need more work on the 
 > > document, it might be possible to run a BOF at IETF62 (or 
 > if we manage 
 > > to get past even that, a BOF might not even be necessary).
 > 
 > Yes, that would be good.

=> I hope so.

 > 
 > > But that requires quite a bit of work from the different 
 > parties on this 
 > > list.  Hopefully the amount of energy/commitment from people will 
 > > increase with the creation of this mailing list :-)
 > 
 > I'm keeping my fingers crossed :-)
 > 
 > > Someone(s) would have to knock their heads together and 
 > write a single 
 > > document which would be a sufficiently good starting point.
 > 
 > Agreed.  I'm willing to put some time/effort into this.


=> I'll put some time before IETF and let's have a short meeting
to discuss comments, having a single doc ...etc.

Hesham

 > 
 > 	Henrik
 > 
 > 

===========================================================
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
 of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly
 prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
 and delete all copies.
===========================================================