RE: NEMO and draft-tsirtsis-dsmip-problem-03

["Soliman, Hesham" <H.Soliman@flarion.com>]

 > Maybe my concern is only that registering both addresses has to be
 > optional. 

=> Sure, it's always optional to register your HoA. 

   For instance, a NEMO MR could use an IPv6 Home 
 > address in the
 > BU as it does today, and explicit mobile network of both 
 > types. And it
 > could have an alternate (v4?) home address option as well. 

=> Ok.

 > 
 > Note that the MR also owns at least one 'home' address for 
 > each mobile
 > network, v4 or v6. So it is reachable that way regardless of 
 > the type of
 > the Home Address(es) that is (are) singled out in the registration.

=> We don't assume that the HA will register an HoA just because
another HoA belonging to the MN was registered. A binding is only
created when a BU is received. So if multiple addresses need to be 
registered, they have to be explicitly registered. 

Hesham

 > 
 > Pascal
 > 

===========================================================
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
 of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly
 prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
 and delete all copies.
===========================================================