RE: Requirements

["tim clifford" <tjc@lacunanet.net>]

which would seem to imply that we need to try to convince people at the ietf
(i think its a misnomer to say "convince the ietf") that we're talking about
more than a link layer, maybe the right term is mobility, or roaming
services, or disadvantaged user devices, or large populations of always on
subscribers  ;-)

tc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-more@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-more@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf
> Of James Kempf
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:47 AM
> To: more@ops.ietf.org; jgw@cisco.com
> Subject: Re: Requirements
>
>
> John,
>
> There is no such catalog. In general, IETF has been resistent to
> making wireless a special category. It is viewed as just another link
> layer.
>
> 		jak
>
> >Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:15:34 -0400
> >From: "John G. Waclawsky" <jgw@cisco.com>
> >To: more@ops.ietf.org
> >Subject: Re: Requirements
> >
> >Does anyone know if the IETF does an cataloguing of activities
> with regards to
> wireless?
> >For example is there a cross reference anywhere that describes wireless
> activities going
> >on in the IETF?  This information would probably be very uesful
> for the mobile
> >operators.    Regards  John
> >
> >
>