Re: MORE BOF

["Atsushi Takeshita" <takeshita@dcl.docomo-usa.com>]

Dana,

To be honest, I have not decided what I will present.

I will join in the classification discussion and give comments.
(Sorry. I couldn't join in the discussion last week because of
my tight schedule.)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dana L. Blair" <dblair@cisco.com>
To: "James Kempf" <James.Kempf@Sun.COM>; <more@psg.com>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 9:49 AM
Subject: RE: MORE BOF


> I am most intersted in the following agenda item:
>
> >From BoF agenda:
> Classification of requirements to working - 5 min.
> groups (Atsushi Takeshita, takeshita@dcl.docomo-usa.com)
>
> What is planned for this 5 mins ?  Will there actually
> be a classification presented ?  I'll already posted my
> comments on the draft and Dave Lindert suggested some
> classification.  Please let me know how I can help with
> continued classification.
>
> thanks,
> Dana
>
> >   -----Original Message-----
> >   From: owner-more@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-more@ops.ietf.org]On
Behalf
> >   Of James Kempf
> >   Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 12:25 PM
> >   To: more@psg.com
> >   Subject: MORE BOF
> >
> >
> >   The MORE BOF is going forward. We will have the first hour
> >   of the second Seamoby session, which is on Wed. Aug 8 at 15:30. There
> >   may or may not be an official announcement on ietf-announce, our
> >   Area Director is still talking with the secretariat. There should
> >   be an updated agenda posted at the meeting to inform people.
> >
> >   I've attached a BOF description and a tentative (the emphasis is
> >   on tentative) agenda. IF some speakers drop out, we will increase
> >   the time for discussion, and if there is not enough discussion
> >   to fill the time, we will simply adjorn the BOF and start the
> >   Seamoby meeting.
> >
> >   jak
> >
>
>