Re: Document status

["John G. Waclawsky" <jgw@cisco.com>]

We need to discuss how to proceed with the "more" group activity. I am suggesting
that since there are so many requirements in the draft, that we number the
requirements for discussion and  redistribute as a starting point. Then we can
begin the process of scrubbing the draft (add, delete, condense, clarify,
identify what area in the IETF is working on each item, if any... etc.) and
re-organize the document. Your thoughts?.       Regards  John

kempf wrote:

> John,
>
> Paul is still on vacation. I assume he will work on generating a new
> version when he gets back.
>
>                 jak
>
> >Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:26:29 -0400
> >From: "John G. Waclawsky" <jgw@cisco.com>
> >X-Accept-Language: en
> >To: more@psg.com
> >Subject: Document status
> >
> >Does anyone know what the current document status is (the draft with Paul
> >Reynolds name on it)? Is there another (later) version of this document
> >available?  I would also like to suggest that since there are so many
> >requirements in the draft, that we number the requirements for discussion and
> >begin the process of scrubbing the draft (add, delete, condense, clarify,
> >identify what area in the IETF is working on each item, if any... etc) and
> >re-organizing it.       Regards  John
> >
> >