RE: Document status

[paul.reynolds@orange.co.uk]

Hello all,
I am back - had a problem as dropped my laptop at the London IETF I will clear
my emails (over 3500) and start on the ID v2 next Monday.
Paul




James Kempf <James.Kempf@sun.com> on 18/09/2001 09:32:10

Please respond to James Kempf <James.Kempf@sun.com>




To:   dblair@cisco.com
      dlindert@cisco.com
cc:   James.Kempf@sun.com
      more@psg.com
      jgw@cisco.com (bcc: Paul REYNOLDS/EN/HTLUK)


Subject:  RE: Document status



Dave,

I sent email to Paul late last week, and I think he is still on vacation.
Since he is the doc editor, we are indeed awaiting his return.

          jak

>X-Sender: dlindert@mira-sjc5-7
>Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:36:43 -0700
>To: "Dana L. Blair" <dblair@cisco.com>
>From: Dave Lindert <dlindert@cisco.com>
>Subject: RE: Document status
>Cc: "kempf" <James.Kempf@sun.com>, <more@psg.com>, <jgw@cisco.com>
>
>Haven't seen any activity here, I assumed we were waiting for Paul's
>return. What are the plans.
>
>Dave...
>
>
>At 11:05 AM 8/28/01 -0400, Dana L. Blair wrote:
>> >   -----Original Message-----
>> >   From: owner-more@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-more@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf
>> >   Of kempf
>> >   Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:54 PM
>> >   To: more@psg.com; jgw@cisco.com
>> >   Subject: Re: Document status
>> >
>> >
>> >   John,
>> >
>> >   Paul is still on vacation. I assume he will work on generating a new
>> >   version when he gets back.
>>
>>Thanks for pointing this out.  I really want to keep this
>>an operator lead activity, and Paul is the key person for
>>that.  Hopefully, when he gets back from vacation he will
>>start an email dialogue and make some suggestions on how to
>>proceed.
>>
>>I do believe the goal of an informational rfc is a good one,
>>and not too difficult to achieve since this acitivity seems
>>to have support from the Area Directors.  No one objected
>>to this goal at the IETF meeting, so we should assume at
>>least tacit approval.
>>
>>thanks,
>>Dana
>>
>> >
>> >               jak
>> >
>> >   >Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:26:29 -0400
>> >   >From: "John G. Waclawsky" <jgw@cisco.com>
>> >   >X-Accept-Language: en
>> >   >To: more@psg.com
>> >   >Subject: Document status
>> >   >
>> >   >Does anyone know what the current document status is (the
>> >   draft with Paul
>> >   >Reynolds name on it)? Is there another (later) version of this document
>> >   >available?  I would also like to suggest that since there are so many
>> >   >requirements in the draft, that we number the requirements for
>> >   discussion and
>> >   >begin the process of scrubbing the draft (add, delete,
>> >   condense, clarify,
>> >   >identify what area in the IETF is working on each item, if
>> >   any... etc) and
>> >   >re-organizing it.       Regards  John
>> >   >
>> >   >
>> >
>> >
>









*******************************************************************************
Important. This E-mail is intended for the above named person and may be
confidential and/or legally privileged. If this has come to you in error you
must take no action based on it, nor must you copy or show it to anyone; please
inform the sender immediately.
*******************************************************************************