I agree that having a group of peers to discuss an issue with should help make our reviews more consistent, and help to limit changes that are based on a reviewer's personal preferences rather than real technical concerns.
Thank you Bert,
dbh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Saperia [mailto:saperia@jdscons.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:53 AM
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Welcome to the MIB Reviewers mailing list
>
>
> On Tuesday 01 October 2002 11:36 am, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > What I have not yet decided is if it would be good to post a review
> > to this list first (for peer-cross-check) before we send it off
> > to the requesting authors/AD/WG. That might be a good thing to do
> > so that we get a better and more consistent review.
> Opinions welcome.
>
> Bert,
>
> My view is that this is an excellent idea. In spite of everones best
> efforts to make specifications clear, there is room for
> interpretation.
> Also different people will solve technical problems in any
> one of a number
> of ways. Posting to this list is an excellent way to get
> peer review.
> Gets my vote.
> /jon
> --
> Jon Saperia
>
> saperia@jdscons.com
> Phone: 617-744-1079
> Fax: 617-249-0874
> http://www.jdscons.com/
>