RE: Draft MIB Review Guidelines

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Thanks Mike,
will review and get comments back to you... possibly just before
ThanksGiving, since I am pretty busy with so many other IETF docs
at the moment :-)(

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Heard [mailto:heard@pobox.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 8 november 2002 10:01
> To: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Draft MIB Review Guidelines
> 
> 
> Colleagues,
> 
> Back in August, when I stirred up the controversy over whether
> TCs should get to remove syntactic constraints of base types,
> Bert Wijnen asked for a volunteer to write a CLR document.
> That volunteer turned out to be me.  The project ended up
> morphing into a MIB review guidelines document, which turned
> out to be quite a bit harder to organize that I thought it
> would be.  I've been struggling to get it written ever since.
> 
> I finally have a draft that is ready for people to poke sticks
> at.  It's far from finished, is probably inadequately
> proofread, and most certainly reflects my own idiosyncratic
> prejudices.  Still, I'd still appreciate any comments that you
> could make, especially if you have suggestions on what
> additional stuff should go in it, what should get cut out, and
> what needs to be reorganized.  [I can already see one thing I
> missed:  something needs to be said about specifying persistency
> of dynamically created rows across reboots.]  The hope-for is
> that with your help I can cobble together something that would
> be suitable for publication as a BCP.  Since it's way past the
> I-D deadline, I'm attaching the draft (such as it is) to
> this e-mail.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your help.  Any comments, especially
> negative ones, will be welcome.
> 
> I will be away on travel until after Thanksgiving and
> consequently in only sporadic e-mail contact, so a slow
> response does not mean that I'm ignoring you.
> 
> Mike
>