[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Importing items used in MODULE-COMPLIANCE and AGENT-CAPABILITIES
- To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: Importing items used in MODULE-COMPLIANCE and AGENT-CAPABILITIES
- From: "Presuhn, Randy" <Randy_Presuhn@bmc.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:35:17 -0600
Hi -
> From: David T. Perkins [mailto:dperkins@dsperkins.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 16:10
> To: C. M. Heard; Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Importing items used in MODULE-COMPLIANCE and
> AGENT-CAPABILITIES
...
> Consider the following...
...
The presence of the IMPORTs should neither help nor hinder
a compiler in this example, but it could be a big help
for a human trying to get a quick understandanding of
the inter-module dependencies.
...
> For MIB compilers that simply skip over the MODULE-COMPLIANCE and
> AGENT-CAPABILITIES, leaving out the IMPORTS is a big win!
...
I don't see how. A compiler still needs to be able to
cope with IMPORTs, including those of "unreferenced" symbols.
Remember, the proposal was not to REQUIRE the IMPORTs, only
to RECOMMEND. I think the rationale about "helping" some
compilers is a red herring. If that were the *sole* rationale,
then the RECOMMENDation would more properly be a REQUIREment.
From my perspective, the value of including these in IMPORTs
is to humans, rather than compilers.
------------------------------------------------------
Randy Presuhn BMC Software, Inc. 1-3141
randy_presuhn@bmc.com 2141 North First Street
Tel: +1 408 546-1006 San José, California 95131 USA
------------------------------------------------------
My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
------------------------------------------------------