Re: Issue with MIB compilation requirement in "AD Review of I-Ds" (http://www.ietf.org/ID-nits.html)

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> With my implementor hat on: I have a related question even though it
> might be out of scope in this context: What happens to SPPI? Is it
> safe to assume that the same change holds true for similar SPPI rules?
> And if yes, do we bother to say so even though these are SMI/MIB
> guidelines? Or do I just flip a coin to decide whether I keep the
> checks for SPPI (in order to remove them later when people are annoyed
> enough of the warnings and document that it be removed...)

I am completely unqualified to write guidelines on the SPPI because
I know next to nothing about it and certainly have never used it to
write a PIB.  If we need a PIB guidelines document, someone else will
have to be resposible for it.

//cmh