[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Index values of zero
Hi -
> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 12:04:31 -0800 (PST)
> From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
> To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: Index values of zero
> In-Reply-To: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15583D7A5@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10212291159550.26846-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
...
> The above is a direct translation of the INDEX rules in RFC 2578
> Section 7.7 up to and including bullet (1). Although not forbidden
> by RFC 2578, using objects of type Gauge32 in an INDEX clause is NOT
> RECOMMENDED under these guidelines.
...
What is so dangerous about the use of Gauge32 as an
index that it should warrant a "NOT RECOMMENDED"?
------------------------------------------------------
Randy Presuhn BMC Software, Inc. SJC-1.3141
randy_presuhn@bmc.com 2141 North First Street
Tel: +1 408 546-1006 San José, California 95131 USA
------------------------------------------------------
My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
------------------------------------------------------