RE: Status of MIB reviewers Guidelines

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

At the bottom I respond

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Heard [mailto:heard@pobox.com]
> Sent: woensdag 29 januari 2003 18:08
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Status of MIB reviewers Guidelines
> 
> 
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
> > Mike, where are we? Or better you?
> 
> Sorry that I have not kept you up-to-date on this
> very slowly progressing project.  I've addressed
> most of the comments received against the November
> version (and fragments that were posted
> subsequently), and the work that remains is to
> finish the section on notification definitions (I
> need to add something about rate limiting) and to
> write the sections on compliance statements and
> revisions to MIB modules.  You may have noticed
> that some of my recent questions to this list were
> directed at closing open issues with regards to
> those last two sections.
> 
> > Would it not be a good idea to disctribute (at least
> > to this list if you do not feel comfortable to put out
> > an I-D yet) the current text that you have. I would   
> > think/hope that based on that we can try to finalize  
> > an I-D that we can start circulating with a wider   
> > audience and then hopefully soon use for MIB review,
> > bit also for telling MIB DOcument editors/authors to
> > check before they submit a MIB document.
>   
> I think I'll have at least first-cut versions of the
> remaining material done by Friday, or over the weekend
> at the latest.  I would prefer to wait until then to
> submit an I-D.  Since I have been summoned to go on jury
> duty next week, I think it would be best to submit
> whatever I have done by Sunday at the latest so that
> it will be available as an I-D next week.  I'll try to
> make myself available to field comments, but it's likely
> that I won't be on-line except in the evenings.
> 
> So now I have two questions for you, Bert:  (a) is
> this plan of action acceptable to you?  (b) do I have
> your permission to submit the work an an ops area
> draft, or should it go in as an individual submission?
> 
YES to both questions.
a name of draft-ietf-ops-<your-selected-title>-00.txt 
would be fine.

Bert
> //cmh
>