[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Omission from reviewer's guide: one hour rule
- To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Omission from reviewer's guide: one hour rule
- From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 23:15:01 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <1043783579.614852@salvator.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
On 28 Jan 2003, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote (on
comp.protocols.snmp):
> > The RFC 2578 mentions that one should use Counter64 only if Counter32
> > would have wrapped in an hour. Why is this so?
>
> There are recently been some debate about this in the IETF and I guess
> this rule does apply in this form anymore. There will be a MIB reviewer
> guidelines document soon which will address among many other things this
> issue. In fact, there is already a published IETF MIB in RFC 3289 which
> solely uses Counter64 and I guess we will see more of them in the
> future.
I missed that one. It was not on my radar screen :)
//cmh