Typos in sec. 4.9 of <draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-00.txt>

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> [Michael Kirkham wrote:]
> > | 4.9.  Revisions to MIB Modules
> > ...
> > 
> > | fielded implemantations based on previous versions of the module.
> > 
> > ...should be 'implementations'.
> > 
> > |   are necessary to ensure "over the wire" compatibility;  the rules
> > |   against changing module names or descriptions or removing obsolete
> > |   definitions are necessary to ensure compilation compatibility.
> > 
> > Should that be 'descriptors' instead of 'descriptions'?
> 
> I guess so

Indeed, those are both typos.  Thanks for pointing them out.  Seems
like these things are inevitable, no matter ho hard one tries :-(

//cmh