[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: consensus call sect 4.4

To: bwijnen@lucent.com
Subject: Re: consensus call sect 4.4
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:28:49 +0100
Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155D6C966@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>(bwijnen@lucent.com)
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155D6C966@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>

>>>>> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) writes:

Bert> I would prefer to change the MAY in the line prefixed with -> in
Bert> a RECOMMENDED (which is basically the same as a SHOULD, but yet
Bert> sounds more relaxed). I would like to see if we have (rough)
Bert> conensus on this. Can all members of this mreview list pls make
Bert> their opinion known.

I am fine with RECOMMENDED.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder    <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: consensus call sect 4.4
  - From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>

References:
- consensus call sect 4.4
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: RE: consensus call sect 4.4
Next by Date: Re: consensus call sect 4.4
Previous by thread: Disappointment with guidelines doc (was: Re: consensus call sect4.4)
Next by thread: Re: consensus call sect 4.4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread