RE: Gauge32 as an index (guidelines Section 4.6.1.1)

["Harrington, David" <dbh@enterasys.com>]

I prefer acceptable to appropriate.
dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Heard [mailto:heard@pobox.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:58 AM
> To: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Gauge32 as an index (guidelines Section 4.6.1.1) 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
> > Maybe (details details I know) if we change
> > 
> > >      - Use of Gauge32 is appropriate for index objects 
> that have gauge
> > >        semantics.
> > 
> > into
> > 
> > >      - Use of Gauge32 is acceptable for index objects 
> that have gauge
> > >        semantics.
> > 
> > I understand that appropriate is also correct...
> > Just a feeling I have that we'll get gratuitous use of it while
> > we all know that it would be very rare cases where it is indeed
> > appropriate/usefull.
> > 
> > But if everyone else is OK with your current text, then I won't
> > keep dwelling.
> 
> I prefer the original, but I can live with this change.  As you
> say, let's see if anyone else has an opinion.
> 
> //cmh
> 
> 
> 
>