Re: Naming Conventions for Descriptors (was: comments/review<draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-00.txt>)

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> I have one more concern. It is something I run into
> very often when reviewing MIB modules. And that is
> 
>    Naming Conventions for descriptors.

[ lots of good details snipped ]

> I think I would like it to also be one of the checkpoints in
> appendix A.
> 
> Do people find this to much of another CLR ??

Bert, I like this idea.  Organizationally, I would suggest
that it belongs somewhere at the end of 4.6 (it would be
4.6.6 if we don't do any section renumbering).  And if you
want it mentioned in the checklist in Appendix A it seems
like item 10 is the place to mention it.

Any other opinions?

Mike