Re: clarify that MIB review requirements are targeted at standards-trackdocuments

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, C. M. Heard wrote:
> I guess you are right, and there are (at least) two places where
> this needs to be changed.  In Section 1, "Introduction", I need to
> change the first sentence so that it says
> 
>    Some time ago the IESG instituted a policy of requiring OPS area
>    review of IETF standards-track specifications containing MIB modules. 
> 
> (s/all IETF/IETF standards-track/).  And in Section 3, I should change
> I need to change the first sentence so that it says
> 
>    In general, IETF standards-track specifications containing MIB
>    modules MUST conform to the requirements for IETF standard-track
>    RFCs documented in [RFC2223bis].
> 
> (s/IETF/IETF standards-track/g).

There is one more place to be changed -- the abstract should read:        
  
   This memo provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of IETF
   standards-track specifications containing MIB modules.
   
(s/specifications/standards-track specifications/)

Agreed?

Mike