Re: Important question about draft-ietf-ipsec-doi-tc-mib-07.txt

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, David T. Perkins wrote:
> Sometimes it is not appropriate or worth the cost of putting things
> in a MIB module that work better as information that augments the
> MIB module. In this case, I would define the object type with
> data type "Unsigned32", and specify in the DESCRIPTION clause
> the semantics of the ranges. In the REFERENCE clause, I would
> put the information (and if available, a URL) so that some one
> could track down the current assignments.
> 
> That's my $.02 worth of advice.

That, exactly, is what I originally suggested to the IPsec folks.

> PS Hint: See the definition of TC SnmpSecurityModel.

Thanks for the input.

//cmh