Volunteers needed for IPCDN wg: prioritized list of IDs for MIB doctor review

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I need help. I have two of these that I have done
detailed review in the past (marked [bw] below).
For the others (i.e. the first 2) I would appreciate volunteers.

Thanks,
Bert 

-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) 
Sent: dinsdag 22 juli 2003 0:56
To: Jean-Francois Mule; Bert Wijnen
Cc: Richard Woundy; Margaret Wasserman; Thomas Narten
Subject: RE: IPCDN wg: prioritized list of IDs for MIB doctor review

> 1. PacketCable/IPCablecom MTA MIB 
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-mtamib-01.txt
> 
Bad chars at 2053
Bad chars at 2056
-: 2 lines containing non-US-ASCII characters

  W: f(ipcdnPktcMta.mi2), (1347,4) NOTIFICATION-GROUP 
     "pktcMtaNotificationGroup" is not used in a
     MODULE-COMPLIANCE in current module

You IMPORT from IF-MIB (RFC2863) and SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB (RFC3411)
and SNMPv2-MIB (RFC3418). So those must be listed as normative
references

But more review needed

> 2. PacketCable/IPCablecom NCS Signaling MIB
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-signaling-01.txt
> 
Bad chars at 1947
Bad chars at 2927
Bad chars at 2930
-: 3 lines containing non-US-ASCII characters

Still to do even basic checking

More review needed

> 3. Subscriber Mgmt MIB
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipcdn-subscriber-mib-11.txt
[Bert has this one under review]
>    addresses comments received during your review. 
>    I sent 1 minor comment was sent yesterday on the ipcdn list.
> 
need to re-check

> 4. BPI+ MIB
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipcdn-bpiplus-mib-10.txt

[Bert Has this one under review]

>    addresses comments from your review. I attach the detailed 
> responses to your comments.
>    2 open issues that do not prevent the request for additional mib
> doctor review imo:
>           a) Explain why for some objects enum values start with 0
>              (docsBpi2CmtsAuthCmBpiVersion, docsBpi2CmtsTEKSAType)
>           b) Split compliance statement into 2, 1 for CM, 1 for CMTS
>    => co-authors expect to release an updated draft by the 
> end of August so you may want to hold on to this one until then
> depending on your timeline.
> 
Gave you detailed answers on your response to my comments.
I see that more of the above have (minor) issues... like InetAddres
DESCRIPTION clause, normative references for all IMPORTed materials
More tomorrow
Bert
> Thank you,
> Jean-Francois.
> Ps: there are 4 other IDs we hope to ask mib doctor review for in the
> early September timeframe.
>