RE: draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02a.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

First, thanks to Mike.

MIB Doctors. Pls review and check.
I would hope that when we get ready with this one
(late august early Sept) that we are ready to do
an IETF wide Last Call and make this an RFC.

I think the revision 01 has been very helpfull lately
in reviewing MIB documents. This new version is intended
to clean up some text and make sure that we are all
in agreement on how to review MIB documents in the
future and to make sure that such review is as 
consistent as possible. It also will help in 
getting authors/WGs to submit documents of much
better quality before we need to do review.

Pls speak up. Either give constructive comments,
explaing what bothers you, suggest better text
if needed.
Or... tell us that you read it, like it and agree.
Or even if you do not like it but can't suggest better
text, then tell us why you do not like it.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. M. Heard [mailto:heard@pobox.com]
> Sent: woensdag 13 augustus 2003 23:50
> To: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02a.txt
> 
> 
> Folks --
> 
> Attached is a pre-release version of the -02 guidelines draft, which
> I have called draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02a.txt.  It
> incorporates all the changes discussed here to date.  If you have
> time, please review it during the the next week;  I intend to submit
> the actual -02 draft before 11am EST on Friday 22 August 2003 since
> the current draft expires on 24 August.  I will be travelling and
> out of e-mail contact from 14 August through 20 August but I will
> attempt to catch up and incorporate any needed changes when I return
> on 21 August.
> 
> One thing that I have added (apart from a list of changes) is an
> "open issues" section at the end.  I did that because the document
> will almost surely need some rework after the IPR WG finishes its
> updates to RFC 2026 Section 10.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike
> 
>