Re: 484 octet limit (was: new feature in smilint?)

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, C. M. Heard wrote:
> I know our documents still say 484, but is it a problem worth
> worrying about in practice? The MIB review guidelines document
> is silent on this point, and I know that it's not something I
> look for in MIB reviews;  do I need to mend my ways and/or fix
> the guidelines document?

Man, my memory is short.  After I sent that message I remembered
that Keith McCloghrie had already said something along these lines;
see http://ops.ietf.org/lists/mreview/mreview.2003/msg00313.html for
the archive entry.  Please comment;  it would be nice to hear
opinions one way or the other.

//cmh