RE: Redundant objects

["Dave Thaler" <dthaler@windows.microsoft.com>]

Thanks for the pointer Randy.

However that text can be read as just saying it was the
criteria used during the design of that MIB.  It doesn't 
really say this is the OPS-area policy for all MIBs,
nor does it touch on the cross-MIB redundant objects
issue.  It's better than nothing though :)

-Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]
On
> Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 2:48 PM
> To: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Redundant objects
> 
> Hi -
> 
> > From: "Dave Thaler" <dthaler@windows.microsoft.com>
> > To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 1:30 PM
> > Subject: Redundant objects
> >
> 
> > I'm wondering if there is any "official" policy on
> > redundant objects.  I don't see any mention in the
> > guidelines for MIB reviewers.  I know there are
> > published books from various folks that mention
> > this issue, but so far I haven't found if there's
> > some IETF doc that does.
> ...
> 
> The guideline is mentioned in RFC 1066 section 3 point (5).
> 
> It's been around for a while.
> 
> Randy