RE: [Iptel] read-only compliance for TRIP MIB

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

I am not sure that they are aware about this option. Would you like to make the point on the iptel list?

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> Sent: 14 January, 2004 8:19 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); mreview@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Iptel] read-only compliance for TRIP MIB
> 
> 
> They did not specify that MIN-ACCESS of read-only is OK in 
> their MODULE COMPLIANCE. That is fine by me, but if they do
> so, then of course read-only implementation cannot claim
> compliance. So adding an extra MODULE-COMPLIANCE seems a
> very easy and simple way to address this.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bert 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> > Sent: woensdag 14 januari 2004 16:14
> > To: mreview@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: FW: [Iptel] read-only compliance for TRIP MIB
> > 
> > 
> > This came up in IPTEL. Comments?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: iptel-admin@ietf.org [mailto:iptel-admin@ietf.org]On 
> > Behalf Of David Zinman
> > Sent: 14 January, 2004 4:01 PM
> > To: iptel@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Iptel] read-only compliance for TRIP MIB
> > 
> > 
> > There has been a request to include a "read-only" compliance
> > section in the TRIP MIB. If most implementations plan on 
> > doing read-write support then it might not useful. 
> > However, if there is enough support for read-only compliance,
> > another draft will be issued to support it.
> > 
> > Comments, preferences??
> > 
> > The decision will be made by Tuesday Jan 20.
> > 
> > DZ
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Iptel mailing list
> > Iptel@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel
> > 
>