Re: Review: IESG Agenda and Package for January 22, 2004 Telechat

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> MIB Doctors, here is (a bit belated, appology) the list of
> documents on next weeks IESG telechat agenda.
> 
> Pls review (specifically from a MIB and Network Management point
> of view) and send us (ADs) feedback. 
...
> 2.1 WG Submissions
> 2.1.1 New Item
...
>   o Two-document ballot:  - 3 of 7
>      - draft-ietf-rohc-mib-rtp-09.txt
>        Definitions of Managed Objects for Robus Header Compression (Proposed 
>        Standard) 
>        Note: Made the fix to the terminology Sec Cons an RFC Editor note:. 
>          OLD:
>          Security Considerations.
>          This document is of an informative nature, and does not have any
>          security aspects to address.
>          NEW:
>          Security Considerations.
>          The clear understanding of ROHC channels and their relations to
>          IP interfaces and the physical medium plays a critical role 
>          in ensuring secure usage of ROHC. This document is therefore a
>          valuable adjunct to the Security Considerations found in RFC 3095
>          and other ROHC specifications, however, as it just reviews 
>          information and definitions, it does not add new security issues
>          to the ROHC protocol specifications.. 
>      - draft-ietf-rohc-terminology-and-examples-02.txt
>        RObust Header Compression (ROHC):Terminology and Channel Mapping 
>        Examples (Informational) 
>     Token: Allison Mankin

In the above, the RFC Editor note should be attached to the second
document (draft-ietf-rohc-terminology-and-examples-02.txt).  It clearly
does not apply to draft-ietf-rohc-mib-rtp-09.txt.

>   o draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-05.txt
>     Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP) (Proposed 
>     Standard) - 4 of 7 
>     Token: Margaret Wasserman

The following REVISION/DESCRIPTION pair pertains to a rev that was a
previous I-D and should not appear in the published document:

    REVISION      "200107130000Z"
    DESCRIPTION
           "IP version neutral revision."

See draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-02.txt section 4.5.  My
recommendation is to request that it be deleted.

//cmh