[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of MIB review guidelines draft
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 10:55:06PM -0800, C. M. Heard wrote:
> 1.) Issue a new draft that does nothing except update the references
> (a) to reflect I-Ds with new version (e.g., replace the pointer to
> draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-06.txt with a pointer to to
> draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-07.txt) and (b) to reflect the I-Ds that
> have since been published as RFCs (that list includes RFCs 3584,
> 3591, 3593, and 3621). Then continue to wait for the IPR documents
> to be published and for the RFC copyright procedures and I-D
> disclosure procedures therein to be put into practice.
>
> 2.) Same as above plus add updates that seem to be necessary based
> on what has transpired in MIB reviews over the past six months.
>
> 3.) Something else that I have not thought of.
For me, 2) makes sense.
And for 3), perhaps it helps to contact Scott and to offer him a beer
(or whatever he likes to drink) in order to move the documents we are
waiting on up in his TODO list. ;-)
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany