RE: Review: IESG Agenda and Package for January 22, 2004 Telechat

["Routhier, Shawn" <shawn.routhier@windriver.com>]

I have these on file.

I don't agree with #2 being a must-fix.  I prefer
the idea of square tables - that is the if stats rows
being the same as the system stats rows so they line
up neatly in tables and such.

I'd be delighted to hear others opinions on this.
If they agree that we should remove those objects I'd
further suggest that they be removed but that the object
ids be skipped to allow the column ids to line up, as
I did for the indexing.

regards,
Shawn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Thaler [mailto:dthaler@windows.microsoft.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 5:10 PM
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); C. M. Heard
> Cc: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Review: IESG Agenda and Package for January 22, 2004
> Telechat
> 
> 
> Bert writes:
> > > >   o draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-05.txt
> > > >     Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP)
> > (Proposed
> > > >     Standard) - 4 of 7
> > > >     Token: Margaret Wasserman
> [...]
> > In fact I had some other (earlier) review comments that seem to not
> > have been addressed either.
> 
> I also posted additional comments which have not been addressed.
> A copy is attached.  (Comment #2 is a "must fix". The other two are
> nice-to-have's.)
> 
> -Dave
>