[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Subranging InetAddressPrefixLength

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 02:15:30PM +0100, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> I think that Shawn put it in cause I mentioned a WARNING from SMICng
> that states that a range must be specified. we discussed a bit if 128
> makes sense or if maybe a larger value (I can think of 1K, 32K, 64K,
> 4billion) makes sense. The response from Shawn was that if the 
> length of an IP address gets longer than the 128 for IPv6, that
> many more changes will be needed.  So I am kind of OK with128.

I think SMICng's warning is odd here an no range should be added.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany