FW: opsec meeting description

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

So the OPSEC document: draft-jones-opsec-03.txt
did get quite a bit of feedback from various people
on this list. In Seoul we will have a sort of
panel review (do not know exact format yet).

Does any of the MIB doctors want to participate.
I surely hope so.

Thanks,
Bert 
------- Forwarded Message

From: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
To: agenda@ietf.org
Subject: opsec
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:33:19 -0500

draft-jones-opsec, which has been proposed for BCP, is somewhat 
controversial.  Some people claim that its focus is too narrow, or that 
it mandates functionality that is not yet available.

This meeting will consist of a focused discussion by a panel of 
reviewers.  The issues to be considered include:

	Should this document, or some successor, be published in
	more or less its current form?

	What status should the document have?

	Is there a need for other, related documents, such as 
	operational security requirements for enterprises?

	What venue is best for developing this or related documents?
	How do we get participation by operators of all sorts?


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb



------- End of Forwarded Message