RE: RE: LLDP port ids

["CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <paul.congdon@hp.com>]

My understanding is that we are in the process of setting up formal access
to 802 mailing lists for IETF contributors regardless of attending meetings.
In practice there is no issue with providing draft documents to interested
parties who are capable of credible review and contribution.  I'd say any of
the MIB doctors fit that mold. I have sent Bert the document, but I'm
guessing he already has access.

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:26 AM
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Harrington, David; CONGDON,PAUL 
> (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
> You can access the document because you have attended the 
> IEEE meeting in Vancouver, so you are now an IEEE 802 
> participant. The user name and password were mentioned in the 
> opening meeting. Let me know if you lost this information.
> 
> I do not know what can be arranged for other folks who are 
> not IEEE participants. Maybe Paul can clarify.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> > Sent: 25 February, 2004 7:19 PM
> > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Harrington, David; Wijnen, Bert
> > (Bert); CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> > Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> > Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks Dan and Dave. Now that I understand the context I am happy.
> > 
> > Can I (we) access copies of thoes IEEE documents to find 
> more context?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Bert
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> > > Sent: woensdag 25 februari 2004 18:05
> > > To: Harrington, David; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); CONGDON,PAUL
> > > (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> > > Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> > > Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Actually the LLDP MIB will replace the PTOPO MIB.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Dan
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org
> > > > [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of 
> Harrington, David
> > > > Sent: 25 February, 2004 7:02 PM
> > > > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> > > > Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> > > > Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Bert,
> > > > 
> > > > This discussion is about which is the better IETF object to
> > > use in the
> > > > Link Layer Discovery Protocol being developed by the IEEE.
> > > > LLDP will be
> > > > a standard mechanism to populate the PTOPO MIB.
> > > > 
> > > > I brought the discussion to the mib doctors because I am
> > > advising the
> > > > IEEE, the answer is obviously unclear, and I am seeking
> > > opinions from
> > > > other mib doctors.
> > > > 
> > > > Can you recommend a better list for my seeking counsel on this?
> > > > 
> > > > dbh
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 11:45 AM
> > > > > To: CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> > > > > Cc: mreview@ops.ietf.org; mlavine@foundrynet.com
> > > > > Subject: RE: RE: LLDP port ids
> > > > > 
> > > > > [removed those qwho I know to be on mreview list]
> > > > > 
> > > > > Interesting discussion.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Can some one tell me which document this topic 
> belongs to? And 
> > > > > is it appropriate to not feed this discussion into 
> the mailing 
> > > > > list (group) that actually is working on that document?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Bert
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
>