RE: use of OBJECT-IDENTITY

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

> [soapbox]
> I think this whole issue of one MIB and multiple MIB modules is a huge
> CLR. 
> In reality, most users think a mib module is a MIB, despite 
> the constant
> correction by mib doctors.
> When can we get rid of this CLR?
> [soapbox]
> 

I think that this C(onsistency) L(anguage) R(ule) should stay. 'MIB' is today the common alias for MIB, MIB module, MIB object, and maybe other - and even if one usage may be more popular than other, we should aim to make the distinction and use the correct terminology at least in the IETF documents. 

> dbh
> 
> 

Regards,

Dan