[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: use of OBJECT-IDENTITY

To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: Re: use of OBJECT-IDENTITY
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:26:23 +0100
Cc: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15503DB0872@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Mail-followup-to: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15503DB0872@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Reply-to: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 04:44:04PM +0100, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> In draft-ietf-dhc-server-mib-10.txt I see the use of
> OBJECT-IDENTITY that I think was not intended.

I agree. But I think there is nothing in the written SMI that renders
this illegal. This usage of the OBJECT-IDENTITY macro also raises 
interesting questions what the status clause really means for the
things registered on that branch...

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

References:
- use of OBJECT-IDENTITY
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: use of OBJECT-IDENTITY
Next by Date: Re: use of OBJECT-IDENTITY
Previous by thread: use of OBJECT-IDENTITY
Next by thread: Re: use of OBJECT-IDENTITY
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread