Re: FW: Personal invitation to comment on the RPR MIB - Ballot P802. 17/D 3.2 2nd Recirculation

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Harrie Hazewinkel" <harrie@lisanza.net>
> To: <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
> Cc: "Harrie Hazewinkel" <harrie@lisanza.net>; "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>; "Mreview (E-mail)"
<mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 7:08 AM
> Subject: Re: FW: Personal invitation to comment on the RPR MIB - Ballot P802. 17/D 3.2 2nd Recirculation
>
> On Saturday, April 17, 2004, at 03:23 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 10:31:02PM +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> >> If anyone has time to do a review of this MIB, then PLEASE do so asap.
> >> Send comments to Glenn Parsons (pls copy me)
> >
> > Can we get the IEEE to generally name their modules with an IEEE
> > prefix,
> > that is IEEE-RPR-MIB instead of just RPR-MIB?
>
> I beleive this would be good practise, but in such a case I
> believe also that the IETF should adopt the same approach by
> prefixing 'IETF-'.
>
> cheers,
> Harrie

Too bad we can't simply assign unique object identifiers to them
like we could with ASN.1 modules.   ;-)

Randy