[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
section 4.6.2 of review-guidelines
HI,
I was wondering what others think of the following.
It maybe is a little subjective, since I mentioned it
sometimes in reveiws but is not really incorrect.
The issue is that I sometimes have noticed that in the
DESCRPTION clause a textual equivalent of for instance the
DEFVAL-clause, or UNITS is given.
I personally dislike this, since it for of all MUST go
into a DEFVAL-clause or UNITS-clause and as a result
is redundant. Therfore, I beleive we should
add some text in section 4.6.2 regarding this.
I understand it may be seen as a CLR, but then again
an editor simply creates himself more work by adding
the textual information that is/must be part in the
FORMAL clauses.
Harrie