Re: review question

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Harrie Hazewinkel" <harrie@lisanza.net>
> To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> Cc: "Harrie Hazewinkel" <harrie@lisanza.net>
> Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 4:54 AM
> Subject: review question
...
> I have been reviewing the draft-ietf-ipcdn-docsisevent-mib-03.txt.
> In there the following approach is used.
>
> All notifications contain a set of objects/varbinds that are common
> to all and some are type specific. Some definitions are below.
> In the DESCRIPTION-clause of only the first one is the complete
> semantics/description given for the common varbinds. All others do
> 'assume; it is there. Do we consider this a good approach.
>
> Personally, I do not think so, but directly saying the description
> must always be repeated I am not sure if people would like that.
> I would like to know what others believe is best.
...

I also dislike this approach.

Randy