Updating the MIB Review guidelines - my comments part 2

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Here are my comments about the remainder of the doc. Just a few :-)

- probably better to reference rfc3291bis instead of 3291.
  Juergen is fixing a last issue and then it goes to RFC-Ed queue
  (i.e. it has been approved by IESG modulo a fix for the last issue)
- 3191bis has a few extra TCs that we probably want to list in appex B
  (and I should add them to www.ops.ietf.org web pages
- We may want to add the TCs from RFC3705 to app B. and to the web page
  of course.

That's it. Thanks for your work on this Mike!


Thanks,
Bert