Re: Bugs in UDP-MIB and TCP-MIB (was: RE: MIB DOctor review of: draft-ietf-ipv6-inet-tunnel-mib-01.txt)

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Rajiv Raghunarayan wrote:
> There are a two places in the TCP-MIB where this issue arises.
> I've got the original/old descriptions snippets and the proposed
> modifications listed below.

[ ... change "zero length string" to '0.0.0.0' or '::' ... ]

> As to the impact of this change, any implementation of this
> draft would need to accordingly incorporate this change! I am
> not certain as to the extent of the implementation, though.
> But if required, we could run this by on the ipv6 and tcp
> mailing lists to get some feedback.
> 
> Does this qualify for an AUTH48 change?

That decision is the IESG's to make, but my advice to them would be
to say "yes", subject to consent from the IPv6 WG.

Mike