[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)

To: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
Subject: Re: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:17:09 +0200
Cc: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>, "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10410272142470.17886-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
Mail-followup-to: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>, "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>, "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10410272031360.26201-100000@shell4.bayarea.net> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10410272142470.17886-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>
Reply-to: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:44:42PM -0700, David T. Perkins wrote:
 
> It's find with me as long as it will be possible for me to
> update and submit the old I-D I did on adding support for
> Counter64 in SNMPv1 as an informational RFC.

I believe Counter64 is SNMPv1 is pointless since we have SNMPv2c.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

Follow-Ups:
- RE: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)
  - From: "David B Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net>

References:
- Re: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)
  - From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
- Re: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)
  - From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)
Next by Date: RE: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)
Next by thread: RE: 32-bit and 64-bit counters (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread