[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: Re: [RMONMIB] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-rmonmib-raqmon-pdu- 08.txt]
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:52:33PM +0100, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> Randy Presuhn suggested that we probably have intended that
> accisble-for-notify was/is OK (in other words that we potentialy
> have meant "e.g." instead of "i.e.". I personally agree with that.
If there is concensus that "i.e." should have been "e.g.", then we
should file an RFC errata and probably that is even good enough
since I believe we really discuss a corner case here and if we try
to clarify all these corner cases in the review guidelines document,
the guidelines document may become less usable.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany