Re: Do we agree on an RFC-Erratum for RFC2578

To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: Re: Do we agree on an RFC-Erratum for RFC2578
From: Frank Strauß <strauss@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:34:51 +0100
Cc: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>, "Keith McCloghrie (E-mail)" <kzm@cisco.com>, Mark Ellison <ellison@ieee.org>
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155062BE8C9@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155062BE8C9@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>

On 13. Jan 2005, at 20:11 Uhr, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

Mmm... I was first trying to get (some broader) consensus on it


The issue's status is just "submitted" (whoever decides on
advancing the status). :-)

So may I assume that you agree?


Yes, I agree.

References:
- RE: Do we agree on an RFC-Erratum for RFC2578
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>