RE: Contact-info fo rmibs

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Inline

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of David B Harrington
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 22:11
> To: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'
> Cc: 'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'; 'David Levi'; 'Mreview (E-mail)'
> Subject: Contact-info fo rmibs
> 
> 
> Hi Bert,
> 
> Once we finish the current mibs we intend to close the bridge-mib WG.
> 
We can. Normally we keep the WG alive till RFC comes out, so that
there is a place to go to if any issue comes up during RFC-Editing process.
Sometimes I DO close the WG early if I erally want to get rid of it.
Or top give a clear MSG: this is really over.

> Would it make more sense to have the contact info in the mibs be
> ietfmibs@ops.ietf.org rather than bridge-mib@ietf.org? or maybe keep
> it as bridge-mib and add an RFC-Ed note to change it to ietfmibs upon
> publication as an RFC?
> 
I believe the wg mailing list is at ietf.org, so we can keep
it active if we want to.

> As an alternative, might it be a good idea to have
> ietfmibs@ops.ietf.org or a similar generic-mib mailing list subscribe
> to the mailing lists of mib-specific WGs such as bridge-mib when the
> WG is closed?
> 
long term. mailing list names are not guaranteed to exist forever.
So it does not matter that much in my view.

Bert
> David Harrington
> dbharrington@comcast.net
> 
> 
> 
>