Please review documents on IESG agenda for June 9, 2005

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

MIB doctors, 

as always, pls review. Specifically for SNMP/MIB or
otehr NM related issues or concerns. 
Pls send any comments you may have by COB wednesday June 8.

Note that I plan to also add to this agenda the
following 2 MIB documents:

  draft-ietf-entmib-state-07.txt for Prposed Standard

  draft-ietf-ipcdn-docsisevent-mib-06.txt

Thanks, Bert


--- IESG agenda

2. Protocol Actions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
	reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
	infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"


2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-tls-psk-08.txt
    Pre-Shared Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) (Proposed 
    Standard) - 1 of 8 
    Token: Russ Housley
  o draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil-06.txt
    Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic 
    Addresses Configuration Information (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 8 
    Note: Last Call issued resolved during interim meeting; the confirming 
    comment period. on the mailing list will end on 6/8/2005. 
    Token: Ted Hardie
  o Two-document ballot:  - 3 of 8
     - draft-sparks-sip-nit-problems-02.txt
       Problems identified associated with the Session Initiation Protocol's 
       non-INVITE Transaction (Informational) 
     - draft-sparks-sip-nit-actions-03.txt
       Actions addressing identified issues with the Session Initiation 
       Protocol's non-INVITE Transaction (Proposed Standard) 
       Note: PROTO shepherd Rohan Mahy rohan@ekabal.com. These are WG docs.. 
       New contexts/intro paragraphs supplied in Notes to RFC Editors (please 
       see). 
    Token: Allison Mankin
  o draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-14.txt
    A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 8 
    Token: Allison Mankin
  o draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-label-01.txt
    The SDP (Session Description Protocol) Label Attribute (Proposed Standard) 
    - 5 of 8 
    Note: PROTO Shepherd: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com. Normatively required 
    for sipping conference package 
    Token: Allison Mankin
  o draft-ietf-sipping-conference-package-10.txt
    A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Conference State 
    (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 8 
    Note: PROTO shepherd: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com. Revision for AD/Last 
    Call comments about to appear (6/1) 
    Token: Allison Mankin
  o draft-ietf-mip6-mipv6-mib-07.txt
    Mobile IPv6 Management Information Base (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 8 
    Token: Margaret Wasserman
  o draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-06.txt
    Session Initiation Protocol Call Control - Conferencing for User Agents 
    (BCP) - 8 of 8 
    Note: PROTO shepherd: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com. Revised for GEN-ART 
    review 
    Token: Allison Mankin

2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-grow-bgp-wedgies-02.txt
    BGP Wedgies (Informational) - 1 of 1 
    Note: David Meyer will be the proto shepherd 
    Token: David Kessens

3.1.2 Returning Item
  o draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-issues-10.txt
    Operational Considerations and Issues with IPv6 DNS (Informational) - 1 of 
    1 
    Note: To check on the status of the resolution of Thomas DISCUSS. 
    Token: David Kessens


3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
  o draft-mealling-epc-urn-00.txt
    A Uniform Resource Name Namespace For The EPCglobal Electronic Product Code 
    (EPC) (Informational) - 1 of 1 
    Token: Ted Hardie

3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Does this document
	represent an end run around the IETF's working groups
	or its procedures? Does this document present an incompatible
	change to IETF technologies as if it were compatible?" Other
	matters may be sent to the RFC Editor in private review.

3.3.1 New Item
  o draft-reschke-webdav-property-datatypes-09.txt
    Datatypes for WebDAV properties (Experimental) - 1 of 1 
    Token: Ted Hardie

3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE