RE: Please review documents on IESG agenda for June 9, 2005

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Inline

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 14:54
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Please review documents on IESG agenda for June 9, 2005
> 
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org 
> > 
> >   draft-ietf-ipcdn-docsisevent-mib-06.txt
> > 
> 
> This document is heavily dependent on the ipcdn device MIB (still in WG)
> and rf MIB (AD tracking). What's the point of bringing it to the IESG,
> when the former two documents may still change? It looks like brinbging
> all three as one package makes more sense. 
> 

The IPCDN WG has a record of looooong delays.
So when one doc is ready, I tend to get it passed IESG so it is in
RFC-Ed queue. The docs it is dependent on are claimed to be close
to done as well.

> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
>