Re: RMON document advancement

["C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>]

On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> I think we have in this particular space a number of cases where we
> can prove that the IETF model causes (a) either (almost) endless
> delays or (b) forces artificial document splits or (c) cases where we
> at the end manage to advance but only by not doing the updates that
> actually would have been required.

Let me know if you need specific examples.

> In other words, recycling at Proposed seems to document best current
> practice in the MIB module space.

Yes.

//cmh