RE: SNMP over Ethernet

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

This is what Juergen respondend back in Nov and I agreed.

Does that Help Dan?

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-mreview@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 08:43
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Mreview (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: SNMP over Ethernet
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 03:33:38AM +0200, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>   
> > Please help me with a homework. The IEEE 802.1 WG is discussing the
> > option on of using SNMP over Ethernet (don't ask). I see that this
> > mapping originally defined by RFC 1089 was not included later in the
> > list run by RFC 3417? Does anything prevent doing RFC 1089
> > encapsulation for SNMPv3?
> 
> I would say that a new document needs to be created which obsoletes
> RFC 1089 and which defines the necessary infrastructure, at least a
> suitable transport domain TC and OID definition.
> 
> > BTW, is the old SNMP list still active? I presume that most people
> > are on both lists anyway.
> 
> I would expect that most email addresses will bounce these days. I
> think this is something rather straight forward to define where an
> individual draft can actually be lifted on the standards track with
> the appropriate review organized by the AD and the longer IETF last
> call process.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 
> 28725 Bremen, Germany
>